Case C-564/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Puma SE (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(5) — Article 76 — Opposition proceedings — Relative grounds for refusal — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 19 — Rule 50(1) — Earlier decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) recognising the reputation of the earlier trade mark — Principle of sound administration — Taking account of those decisions in subsequent opposition proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Procedural obligations of the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0564
62016CA0564
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C-564/16 P) (*1)
Parties
Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Puma SE (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, abogado)
Operative part of the judgment
2.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs.
EurLex Case Law