- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-38/20: Action brought on 23 January 2020 – Lotto24 v EUIPO (LOTTO24)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0038
62020TN0038
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.3.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 77/59
—
(Case T-38/20)
(2020/C 77/80)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Lotto24 AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Brexl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark LOTTO24 in orange (Pantone 130) and red (Pantone 1807) – Application for registration No 17 996 822
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2019 in Case R 1216/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—