- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-276/16: Action brought on 30 May 2016 — Viridis Pharmaceutical v EUIPO — Hecht-Pharma (Boswelan)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0276
62016TN0276
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.7.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 251/46
(Case T-276/16)
(2016/C 251/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Viridis Pharmaceutical (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hecht-Pharma GmbH (Hollnseth, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Boswelan’ — European Union trade mark No 3 381 563
Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 February 2016 in Case R 2837/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it rejects the applicant’s appeal against the declaration of the revocation of European Union trade mark No 003381563 in relation to ‘medicinal products for the treatment of multiple sclerosis’;
—order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Genuine use of the mark;
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Proper reasons for non-use of the mark;
—Infringement of Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009, in particular infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.