EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Court of 17 September 1964. # Société rhénane d'exploitation et de manutention (Sorema) v High Authority of the ECSC. # Case 36-64 R.

ECLI:EU:C:1964:68

61964CO0036

September 17, 1964
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61964O0036

European Court reports French edition Page 00451 Dutch edition Page 00459 German edition Page 00474 Italian edition Page 00431 English special edition Page 00348

Parties

IN CASE 36/64 R SOCIETE RHENANE D' EXPLOITATION ET DE MANUTENTION ' SOREMA ', A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN STRASBOURG, 11 RUE FISCHART, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGERS AND BY R . GARON, ADVOCATE OF THE STRASBOURG BAR, 8 RUE DU MARCHE, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF CHARLES TURK, ADVOCATE AT THE COURT OF LUXEMBOURG, 6 RUE BRASSEUR, APPLICANT, V HIGH AUTHORITY OF THE EUROPEAN COAL AND STEEL COMMUNITY, LUXEMBOURG, REPRESENTED BY ITS AGENTS, MESSRS . MATTHIES AND OLIVIER, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT ITS OFFICES, 2 PLACE DE METZ, DEFENDANT,

Subject of the case

APPLICATION TO SUSPEND THE OPERATION OF DECISION NO 15/64 OF 15 JULY 1964 OF THE HIGH AUTHORITY, CONTESTED IN THE MAIN APPLICATION.

Grounds

WHEREAS THE APPLICANT HAS ALLEGED THAT THE EXECUTION OF DECISION NO 15/64 OF 15 JULY 1964 WOULD INVOLVE IRREPARABLE DAMAGE FOR IT; WHEREAS, NONETHELESS, THE CIRCUMSTANCES FOLLOWING UPON THE JUDGMENT IN CASE 67/63 OF 19 MARCH 1964 AND IN PARTICULAR THE ATTITUDE ADOPTED BY OKU DO NOT APPEAR TO JUSTIFY THIS ALLEGATION; WHEREAS THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PUT FORWARD FACTS OR ARGUMENTS CAPABLE OF INVALIDATING THIS FINDING; WHEREAS CONSEQUENTLY THE CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR THE GRANT OF A SUSPENSION OF THE OPERATION OF THE DECISION HAVE NOT BEEN MET; WHEREAS, THEREFORE, THE APPLICATION FOR SUSPENSION MUST BE DISMISSED;

Operative part

THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES HEREBY ORDERS : 1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED . 2 . THE COSTS ARE RESERVED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia