I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 240/42)
Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch
Applicant: Group Nivelles (Gingelom, Belgium) (represented by: J.A.M. Jonkhout, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Easy Sanitary Solutions BV (Oldenzaal, Netherlands)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: European Union design (Douchegoot) — European Union design No 107 834 0025
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2020 in Case R 2664/2017-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare invalid, correcting the grounds as necessary, the European Union design of Easy Sanitary Solutions BV;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 64 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.