EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-411/23, D.: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 3 July 2023 — D. SA v P. SA

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0411

62023CN0411

July 3, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/43

9.10.2023

(C/2023/43)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: D. SA

Defendant: P. SA

Questions referred

1.Does an engine design defect revealed by the manufacturer constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ and does it come within the scope of ‘unexpected [flight safety] shortcomings’ within the meaning of recitals 14 and 15 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) if the carrier knew about the potential design defect several months before the flight?

2.If the defect in the design of the engine referred to in [Question] 1 constitutes an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ within the meaning of recitals 14 and 15 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, do ‘all reasonable measures’ as mentioned in recital 14 and in Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 refer to the expectation that the air carrier should take into account the likely revelation of a design defect in the aircraft engine and take preventive steps in order to have back-up aircraft at the ready for the purpose of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 in order to relieve it of the obligation to pay the compensation provided for in Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7(1) of that regulation?

Language of the case: Polish

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/43/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(1) OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia