I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
11.3.2024
(Case T-103/23) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Article 42(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Decision of the Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to bring the case to judgment - Procedural act of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Lack of jurisdiction)
(C/2024/1864)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: Victor-Constantin Stan, (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: A. Şandru and V. Costa Ramos, lawyers)
Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by: L. De Matteis, F.-R. Radu and E. Farhat, acting as Agents)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of Permanent Chamber No 4 of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 9 December 2022 by which the latter brought the case concerning him to judgment.
1.The action is dismissed.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and the European Parliament.
3.Mr Victor-Constantin Stan shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.
4.Mr Stan, the EPPO, the Council, the Commission and the Parliament shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
Language of the case: Romanian.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1864/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)