EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-103/23: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2023 — Stan v European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Action for annulment — Article 42(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 — Decision of the Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to bring the case to judgment — Procedural act of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Lack of jurisdiction)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0103

62023TB0103

December 15, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1864

11.3.2024

(Case T-103/23) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Article 42(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 - Decision of the Permanent Chamber of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office to bring the case to judgment - Procedural act of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office - Lack of jurisdiction)

(C/2024/1864)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Victor-Constantin Stan, (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: A. Şandru and V. Costa Ramos, lawyers)

Defendant: European Public Prosecutor’s Office (represented by: L. De Matteis, F.-R. Radu and E. Farhat, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of Permanent Chamber No 4 of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office of 9 December 2022 by which the latter brought the case concerning him to judgment.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed.

2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union, the European Commission and the European Parliament.

3.Mr Victor-Constantin Stan shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO), with the exception of those relating to the applications to intervene.

4.Mr Stan, the EPPO, the Council, the Commission and the Parliament shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.

Language of the case: Romanian.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1864/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia