- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-263/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Bopp v OHIM (Representation of a green octagonal frame) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a green octagonal frame — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Offer of evidence submitted for the first time in the reply — Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Document sent to OHIM by fax — Applicable rules)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0263
62011TA0263
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 79/15
(Case T-263/11)(1)
(Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a green octagonal frame - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Offer of evidence submitted for the first time in the reply - Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Document sent to OHIM by fax - Applicable rules)
2013/C 79/26
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Carsten Bopp (Glashütten, Germany) (represented by: C. Russ, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel and D. Walicka initially, then by K. Klüpfel and A. Pohlmann, Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2011 (Case R 605/2010-4), concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a figurative sign representing a green octagonal frame.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 March 2011 (Case R 605/2010-4);
2.Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.