I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for a figurative Community trade mark depicting a pelican – Earlier Community or national figurative trade mark Pelikan – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 96, 98, 102-103, 106)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 September 2003 (Case R 191/2002-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark for goods in Classes 1, 2 and 17 – Application No 1005826
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Community or national figurative mark Pelikan
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Registration refused
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Dainichiseika Colour & Chemicals Mfg. Co. Ltd to pay the costs.