EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-145/24: Action brought on 8 March 2024 – CU v EEAS

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0145

62024TN0145

March 8, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/3079

13.5.2024

(Case T-145/24)

(C/2024/3079)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: CU (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the Director of the Budget and Human Resources of 5 May 2023 rejecting his request for assistance submitted on 18 February 2021 under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations;

order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the psychological harm resulting from its failings, assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 25 000;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the reasonable time limit, the duty to provide assistance and the principle of good administration due to the length of the investigation, the time taken to process the request for assistance, and the failure to process the complaint submitted against the adverse decision which justifies the payment of compensation;

2.Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the right to be heard in an effective and useful manner, the lack of impartiality and a breach of the right to fair proceedings and the right to be entitled to a full investigation which seeks evidence both for and against the person concerned;

3.Third plea in law based on a manifest error of assessment of the allegations made, the concept of harassment and what should be considered to be abusive conduct, as well as the individual and collective responsibilities concerned.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3079/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia