- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-16/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gyulai Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 13 January 2012 — HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt. v Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0016
62012CN0016
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.4.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 126/4
(Case C-16/12)
2012/C 126/06
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt.
Defendant: Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet
Questions referred
1.Must the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations, which are considered to be fundamental principles of European Union law, be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a Member State from adopting provisions which vary the content of a contract concluded by a Member State, in its capacity as proprietor, to the detriment of the other party to the contract, classifying the object of the contract as non-transferable and thereby preventing the other party from exercising the rights derived from the contract?
2.If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the national court obliged, by the principle of sincere cooperation laid down by Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, to disapply the domestic provision governing the legal position on non-transferability and declare the object of the contract transferable, contrary to the provisions of the national legislation?