I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark HYALERA - Earlier national word mark HYAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/6433)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Fidia farmaceutici SpA (Abano Terme, Italy) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vorwarts Pharma sp. z o.o. (Białystok, Poland) (represented by: J. Aftyka, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 May 2023 (Case R 230/2023-5).
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 May 2023 (Case R 230/2023-5);
2.Orders EUIPO and Vorwarts Pharma sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6433/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—