- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-229/14: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb v OHIM — Yorma’s (Yorma Eberl) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Yorma Eberl — Earlier Community and national word marks NORMA — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0229
62014TA0229
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.8.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 262/24
(Case T-229/14)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Yorma Eberl - Earlier Community and national word marks NORMA - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 262/32)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Parr, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Yorma’s AG (Deggendorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Weiß and C. Muck, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2014 (Case R 532/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG and Yorma’s AG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs.
OJ C 194, 24.6.2014.
* * *
Language of the case: German.