EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-253/21: Action brought on 11 May 2021 — Aquino v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0253

62021TN0253

May 11, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.6.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/31

(Case T-253/21)

(2021/C 252/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roberto Aquino (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

accordingly,

annul the decision of 7 July 2020 by which the Director-General of the Directorate-General for Personnel annulled the election of the president of the Staff Committee and decided to rerun that election;

annul the constitutive meeting of 14 September 2020 and the elections which were held during that meeting and, in particular, the election of the president of the Staff Committee;

annul the decision of 5 February 2021 rejecting the complaint filed by the applicant on 6 October 2020;

order the defendant to pay compensation for the non-material harm suffered, ex aequo et bono at EUR 2 000;

order the defendant to pay the entirety of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement by the defendant of its duty to ensure that officials and those elected by them have complete freedom to choose their representatives in accordance with established rules. The applicant also alleges infringement of Article 4 of the Staff Committee’s Rules of Procedure and of the duty of due diligence.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to a hearing and of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia