- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of 3 June 1969. # SA Chanel v Cepeha Handelsmaatschappij NV. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arrondissementsrechtbank Rotterdam - Netherlands. # Case 31-68.
ECLI:EU:C:1969:21
61968CO0031
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Avis juridique important
61968O0031(00)
European Court reports 1970 Page 00403
Parties
IN CASE 31/68
REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE ACTION PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN
SA CHANEL, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE ( FRANCE ),
AND
CEPEHA HANDELSMAATSCHAPPIJ NV, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE IN ROTTERDAM,
Subject of the case
ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 85 OF THE EEC TREATY AND THE RULES GOVERNING ITS APPLICATION,
Grounds
BY JUDGMENT OF 3 DECEMBER 1968 THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK, ROTTERDAM, MADE A REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 85 OF THE TREATY .
THE COURT WAS NOTIFIED BY COMMUNICATION OF 29 JANUARY 1969 FROM THE SAID COURT THAT AN APPEAL HAD BEEN LODGED AGAINST THAT JUDGMENT ON 23 JANUARY 1969 AND THAT " AS A RESULT EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT IS DEFERRED ".
IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE COMMUNICATION JUDGMENT MUST BE SUSPENDED .
Operative part
THE COURT
HEREBY ORDERS :
JUDGMENT IN THE PRESENT CASE IS SUSPENDED PENDING NOTIFICATION TO THE COURT THAT THE APPEAL HAS BEEN DECIDED .