- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-229/18: Action brought on 04 April 2018 — Biolatte v EUIPO (Biolatte)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0229
62018TN0229
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 190/41
(Case T-229/18)
(2018/C 190/65)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Biolatte Oy (Turku, Finland) (represented by: J. Ikonen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Biolatte’ — Application for registration No 15 759 319
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2018 in Case R 351/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the contested decision in its entirety;
—order that the word mark registration should be granted in accordance with Biolatte Oy’s application filed on 17 August 2016 (as amended on 28 October 2016).
Plea in law
—Infringement of article 7 (1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.