- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-453/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0453
62016CN0453
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.10.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 383/7
(Case C-453/16)
(2016/C 383/10)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie
Defendant: Halil Ibrahim Özçelik
Questions referred
1.Is the expression ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, a term of EU law which must be given an autonomous and uniform interpretation?
2.If so, what is the meaning of that term?
3.Does the confirmation, as in the present case, by a member of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of a national arrest warrant previously issued by the police constitute such a ‘judicial decision’?
Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).
* * *