I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2020/C 201/50)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Eternit (Kapelle-op-den-Bos, Belgium) (represented by: J. Muyldermans and P. Maeyaert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eternit Österreich GmbH (Vöcklabruck, Austria)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: European Union design No 2 538 140-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 February 2020 in Case R 1661/2018-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.