I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
7.10.2024
(Case C-434/24, APIA – Centrul Judeţean Bistriţa-Năsăud)
(C/2024/5784)
Language of the case: Romanian
Appellant: JD
Respondent: Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale – Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură – Centrul Județean Bistrița-Năsăud
1.In the interpretation of Article 63(1) of [Regulation No 1306/2013], does a situation in which a beneficiary does not satisfy the conditions for eligibility include a situation in which a contract which was valid at the time of the assessment of the conditions for eligibility is cancelled with retroactive effect in accordance with national legislation, regardless of the time at which that cancellation occurs, or does it not include such a situation?
2.If the answer to the preceding question is in the affirmative, can the principle of proportionality apply with regard to the withdrawal of payment under Article 63(1) of [Regulation No 1306/2013] or not?
—
Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5784/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
Language of the case: Romanian.
—