I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Roxtec AB (Karlskrona, Sweden) (represented by: J. Olsson and J. Adamsson, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wallmax Srl (Milano, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark representing a black square containing seven concentric blue circles — EU trade mark No 14 338 735
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 January 2018 in Case R 940/2017-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the proceedings before EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 2017/1001.