I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
3.2.2025
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Wonderbox - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - No independent subcategory)
(C/2025/566)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Wonderbox (Paris, France) (represented by: O. Klimis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Swile (Montpellier, France)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 7 February 2024 (Case R 776/2023-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: French.
OJ C C/2024/3351, 3.6.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/566/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/566/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
* Language of the case: French.