- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-205/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sibiu (Romania) lodged on 30 April 2015 — Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Brașov v Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horaţiu-Vasile Cruduleci
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0205
62015CN0205
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 245/6
(Case C-205/15)
(2015/C 245/08)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Brașov
Defendants: Vasile Toma, Biroul Executorului Judecătoresc Horaţiu-Vasile Cruduleci
Question referred
On a proper construction of Article 4(3) TEU and Articles 20, 21 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, do those provisions preclude legislation such as Article 16 of the [Romanian] Constitution and Article 30 of Government Emergency Order No 80/2103, which enshrines the principle of equality before the law only as between citizens as natural persons and not between citizens as natural persons and legal persons governed by public law, and which, a priori, exempts legal persons governed by public law from the requirement to pay stamping fees and to lodge a security in order to gain access to justice, whilst making access to justice by natural persons conditional upon payment of stamping fees/the lodging of a security?