I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 462/55)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Neratax LTD (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: V. Katsavos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piraeus Bank SA (Athens, Greece), National Bank of Greece (Athens), Eurobank Ergasias SA (Athens)
Proprietor of the trade marks at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade marks at issue: European Union word marks ELLO, MORFAT and European Union figurative marks ELLO ERMOL, Ello Creamy, MORFAT Creamy — European Union trade marks Nos 12 549 499 (ELLO), 12 549 821 (MORFAT), 14 715 783 (ELLO ERMOL), 14 722 243 (Ello creamy), 14 715 726 (MORFAT Creamy)
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decisions: Decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2021 in Cases R 1295/2020-4, R 1296/2020-4, R 1298/2020-4, R 1299/2020-4, R 1302/2020-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—legally cancel, revoke and annul the contested decisions;
—for the rightful ownership of the trademarks of the application to be upheld and recognized as the applicant’s intellectual property;
—order the opposing parties to pay the costs incurred in the course of the present proceedings.
—Infringement of Articles 101 to 106 TFEU;
—Infringement of Articles 19 to 29 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of recital 7 and Article 17(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.