I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the figurative Community trade mark emergia – Earlier word Community trade mark EMERGEA – Likelihood of confusion – Refusal to register – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 74-75, 82)
ACTION for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2004 (Case R 676/2002-1) relating to opposition proceedings between David Branch and Telefónica, SA.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Telefónica, SA
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark emergia for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 42 – Application No 1694157
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
David Branch
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Community word mark EMERGEA for goods and services in Class 38
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld in part in so far as concerning ‘telecommunications and communications by computer networks’ in Class 38
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders the applicant to pay the costs.