- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-228/16: Action brought on 10 May 2016 — Haverkamp v EUIPO — Sissel (Pebble beach surface pattern)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0228
62016TN0228
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.7.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 243/43
(Case T-228/16)
(2016/C 243/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Reinhard Haverkamp (Kindberg, Austria) (represented by: A. Waldenberger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sissel GmbH (Bad Dürkheim, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the design ‘Pebble beach surface pattern’ — International registration designating the European Union No DM/072198-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 in Case R 2619/2014-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of these proceedings, the proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the invalidity proceedings before EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.