- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2009.#infeurope v Commission of the European Communities.#Action for declaration of failure to act, for annulment and for damages - Public service contracts - Call for tenders concerning consultancy, audit and study services for OHIM - Administrative appeal before the Commission - Implied Commission decision to dismiss - New claims - Connection between the action for a declaration of failure to act and the action for damages - Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-188/08.
ECLI:EU:T:2009:265
62008TO0188
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-188/08)
Action for declaration of failure to act, for annulment and for damages – Public service contracts – Call for tenders concerning consultancy, audit and study services for OHIM – Administrative appeal before the Commission – Implied Commission decision to dismiss – New claims – Connection between the action for a declaration of failure to act and the action for damages – Manifest inadmissibility
3. Actions for damages – Autonomy in relation to action for annulment and action for failure to act – Manifest inadmissibility of actions for annulment and for failure to act – Compensation claim closely linked to the action for a declaration of failure to act – Inadmissibility (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 42-44)
Re:
First, application for a declaration that the Commission failed to act in that it unlawfully failed to annul the decision to award framework contracts following the call for tenders procedure AO/026/06 of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) for the provision of consultancy services, audits and studies, and to terminate the specific contracts concluded under those framework contracts and, in the alternative, application for annulment of the alleged implied decision of the Commission to dismiss the applicant’s administrative appeal of 13 December 2007 in the context of that tendering procedure and, secondly, application for compensation for the harm allegedly suffered as a result of the alleged unlawful omissions on the part of the Commission.