- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-344/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 9 June 2017 — IJDF Italy Srl v Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0344
62017CN0344
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 330/3
(Case C-344/17)
(2017/C 330/04)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: IJDF Italy Srl
Defendants: Violeta Fernando Dionisio, Alex Del Rosario Fernando
Question referred
Must Directive 93/13/EEC, the second sentence of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding a national law that, when cases are related, in particular when there is a guarantee claim related to the original proceedings, provides that the cases are to be determined together before the same court, even though as a result of that provision jurisdiction in respect of the guarantee claim lies with a court other than that within whose jurisdiction the consumer resides or other than that of his address for service?
Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
* * *