- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-92/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2015 — Weissenfels v Parliament (Civil Service — Officials — Action for compensation — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Content of an e-mail sent by the administration to a retired official — Impugnment of the applicant’s honour — Absence — Communication by the staff representing the institution of the applicant’s personal information to his lawyer in proceedings before the General Court — Infringement of Regulation No 45/2001 — False factual assertions)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0092
62014FA0092
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 363/49
(Case F-92/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil Service - Officials - Action for compensation - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Content of an e-mail sent by the administration to a retired official - Impugnment of the applicant’s honour - Absence - Communication by the staff representing the institution of the applicant’s personal information to his lawyer in proceedings before the General Court - Infringement of Regulation No 45/2001 - False factual assertions))
(2015/C 363/58)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Roderich Weissenfels (Freiburg in Brisgau, Germany) (represented by: G. Maximini, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application, firstly, for annulment of the European Parliament’s refusal to compensate the application for the harm which he has suffered due to infringements of his personal rights and of the provisions of Regulation No 45/2011 in the handling of a previous case, and, secondly, for damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Weissenfels to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 448, 15.12.2014, p. 40.