- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-23/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Biernacka-Hoba v EUIPO — Formata Bogusław Hoba (Formata)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0023
62016TN0023
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 111/29
(Case T-23/16)
(2016/C 111/34)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Ilona Biernacka-Hoba (Aleksandrów Łódzki, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Formata Bogusław Hoba (Aleksandrów Łódzki, Poland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘Formata’ — Community trade mark No 11 529 427
Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 November 2015 in Case R 102/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the action to be well founded;
—annul the contested decision insofar as it dismisses the application for cancellation of Trade Mark No 011529427 ‘Formata’;
—amend the contested decision by cancelling Trade Mark No 011529427 ‘Formata’;
—amend the contested decision with regard to the costs;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.