I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceeding - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 038/82)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: J. Sroka, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Universal for Engineering Industries SAE (Giza, Egypt)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 April 2015 (Case R 1303/2014-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Universal for Engineering Industries SAE and Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG.
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal.
2.Certuss Dampfautomaten GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.