- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-177/22: Action brought on 4 April 2022 — Chambers and Others v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0177
62022TN0177
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/32
(Case T-177/22)
(2022/C 222/54)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Alexander Chambers (Barcelona, Spain) and nine other applicants (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the applicants’ payslips for June 2021 in so far as they are indicative of a decision to withdraw the flat-rate allowance owed by way of reimbursement of the costs of travelling from the place of employment to the place of origin;
—annul, in so far as it supplements the statement of reasons for the contested decision, the decision of 22 December 2021 rejecting the complaint of 30 August 2021;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-177/22, Mellish v Commission.