- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-638/20: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — JP v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Open competition — Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0638
62020TB0638
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.9.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/41
(Case T-638/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Open competition - Notice of Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation (AD 7) - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 340/56)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: JP (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Milanowska and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 10 December 2019 by which the selection board for Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 refused, after review, to include her name on the reserve list of successful candidates in that competition, and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.JP shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.