I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeals – Concentrations between undertakings – Electricity distribution market – Decisions to initiate and close proceedings
1. Appeals – Grounds – Review by the Court of the assessment of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58) (see para. 28)
2. Appeals – Grounds – Error of law pleaded not identified – Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 55, 78)
3. Appeals – Pleas in law – Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support its operative part – Plea inoperative (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58) (see paras 64, 80)
4. Competition – Concentrations – Examination by the Commission – Decision to open the detailed examination stage (Council Regulation No 4064/89, Art. 6(1)(c)) (see para. 72)
Appeal brought against the Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 31 January 2006 in Case T-48/03 Schneider Electric v Commission, rejecting as inadmissible an application for annulment of the Commission’s Decision of 4 December 2002 to initiate a detailed examination of the concentration between Schneider and Legrand (Case COMP/M.2283 – Schneider/Legrand II) and of the Commission’s Decision of 13 December 2002 to close the proceedings examining the concentration.
The appeal is dismissed.
Schneider Electric SA is ordered to pay the costs.