Official Journal of the European Union

C series

—

C/2024/5410

16.9.2024

(Case C-529/24)

(C/2024/5410)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Chavrier, J. Bauerschmidt, A. Westerhof Löfflerová and E. d’Ursel, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, Single Resolution Board, European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

—set aside the judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 in Case T-395/22, Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG; (1)

—dismiss the action or, subsidiarily, refer the case back to the General Court;

—order the respondent to pay the costs at first and second instance; and

—in the alternative, order that the effect of the decision at issue be maintained for a period of 30 months from the date on which the judgment becomes final.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

First, the Council submits that the General Court erred in law in paragraphs 32 to 43 of the judgment under appeal by declaring Article 70(7) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 (‘the SRM Regulation’) (2) inapplicable on the ground that the EU legislature had failed to give adequate reasons for the conferral of implementing powers on the Council under Article 291(2) TFEU.

Secondly, the Council criticises the General Court for having erred in law in paragraphs 52, 54, 63-67, 71, 72, 85, 75, 76, 78, 79 and 80 to 82 of the judgment under appeal by misinterpreting Articles 67, 70 and 77 of the SRM Regulation, their interdependence with Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD) (3) and their relationship with the Agreement on the transfer and mutualisation of contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, in holding that Article 8(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 (4) supplements the basic act on the basis of which it was adopted.

Thirdly, the Council submits that the General Court erred in law in paragraphs 114 to 122 of the judgment under appeal by misinterpreting Article 69(1) and Article 70(2) of the SRM Regulation in holding that, despite the clear obligation under Article 69(1) of the SRM Regulation to reach the final target level of 1 % of covered deposits, a strict threshold of 12.5 % should be applied in all circumstances during the initial period.

By way of a subsidiary ground of appeal, the Council requests that the effect of the decision at issue be maintained for a period of 30 months from the date on which the judgment of the Court of Justice becomes final.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5410/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(1) EU:T:2024:333.

(2) Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2014 L 225, p. 1).

(3) Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2014 L 173, p. 190).

(4) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 of 19 December 2014 specifying uniform conditions of application of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (OJ 2015 L 15, p. 1).

—

* * *

Language of the case: German