EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-72/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 4 February 2021 — SIA ‘PRODEX’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0072

62021CN0072

February 4, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.4.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/20

(Case C-72/21)

(2021/C 138/26)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant: SIA ‘PRODEX’

Defendant at first instance and respondent: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Questions referred

1.Must the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature (1) and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 (2) of 27 September 2011, be interpreted as meaning that subheading 4418 20 of the Combined Nomenclature can include door frames and thresholds as separate goods?

2.In the light of the first sentence of rule 2(a) of the general rules for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, included in Annex I, Part One, Section I A of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, can subheading 4418 20 of the Combined Nomenclature also include unfinished door frames, door panels and thresholds provided that they have the essential features of complete and finished door frames and thresholds?

3.Must the wood panels and mouldings at issue in the main proceedings, which have a profile and decorative finish which objectively establish that their use in the manufacture of doors, door frames and thresholds is foreseeable, but which, prior to assembly of the door, must be cut to adjust their length and must have spaces made on them for fixing, and, if necessary, must have spaces for hinges and spaces for locks included in them, be classified under subheading 4418 20 or, based on the features of the specific panels or mouldings, under headings 4411 and 4412 of the Combined Nomenclature?

(1) OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2) Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2011 L 282, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia