I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 312/39)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Artur Florêncio & Filhos, Affsports Lda (Sintra, Portugal) (represented by: D. Martins Pereira Soares, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anadeco Gestion, SA (Cartagena, Spain)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark sflooring in colours black, white and grey — Application for registration No 11 943 586
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 May 2019 in Case R 1870/2018-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—totally admit this appeal
—completely revoke the contested decision;
—amend the contested decision, based on the grounding in this appeal and declare the granting of European Union trademark No 11 943 588 sflooring;
—condemn the EUIPO in the costs incurred by the appellant, including in the costs made in the case that run before EUIPO;
—condemn the other party to bear the appellant’s costs in the EUIPO proceedings.
—Insufficiency of the proofs of genuine use of earlier trademark T-FLOORING
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.