- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-399/21: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — IRnova AB v FLIR Systems AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 24(4) — Exclusive jurisdiction — Jurisdiction over the registration or validity of patents — Scope — Patent application deposited and patent granted in a third State — Status of inventor — Proprietor of the right to an invention)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0399
62021CA0399
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 408/21
(Case C-399/21) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Article 24(4) - Exclusive jurisdiction - Jurisdiction over the registration or validity of patents - Scope - Patent application deposited and patent granted in a third State - Status of inventor - Proprietor of the right to an invention)
(2022/C 408/24)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: IRnova AB
Defendant: FLIR Systems AB
Operative part of the judgment
Article 24(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters,
must be interpreted as:
not applying to proceedings aimed at determining, in the context of an action based on alleged inventor or co-inventor status, whether a person is the proprietor of the right to inventions covered by patent applications deposited and by patents granted in third countries.
(1) OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.