- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-155/14: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2016 — ANKO v Commission (Arbitration clause — Subsidy contracts concluded in the context of the Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) — Persona and Terregov projects — Eligible costs — Reimbursement of sums paid — Counter-claim — Default interest)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0155
62014TA0155
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.6.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 211/44
(Case T-155/14) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
((Arbitration clause - Subsidy contracts concluded in the context of the Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) - Persona and Terregov projects - Eligible costs - Reimbursement of sums paid - Counter-claim - Default interest))
(2016/C 211/55)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, S. Paliou and A. Skoulikis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and P. Arenas, acting as Agents, and by O. Lytra, lawyer)
Re:
Applications, under Article 272 TFEU, seeking, on the one hand, first, a declaration that the Commission’s demand for reimbursement of the subsidies paid to the applicant in implementation of the contracts No. 045459 ‘Perceptual spaces promoting independent aging’, and No. 507749 ‘Impact of e-governance on local and regional administrative services’, concluded in the context of the Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) is unfounded, and, second, to order the Commission to pay the balance of the unpaid subsidies under the first of those contracts and, on the other, to order the applicant, by way of counterclaim, to reimburse the subsidies unduly paid under those contracts.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1)Dismisses the appeal brought by ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias;
2)Orders ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias to pay the European Commission the sum of EUR 606 570,61, corresponding to the reimbursement of the financial contributions which it received under contracts No. 045459 ‘Perceptual spaces promoting independent aging’ and No. 507749 ‘Impact of e-governance on local and regional administrative services’, concluded in the context of the Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) plus default interest as from 3 May 2014 at the rate of 3,75 %;
3)Orders ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias to pay the costs.
*
Language of the case: Greek.
ECLI:EU:C:2016:140
Judgment of 6. 3. 2025 – CASE C-41/24 WALTHAM ABBEY RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 175, 10.6.2014.