I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2011/C 72/57
Language of the case: French
Applicant: AR (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodriguez, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Annulment of EPSO’s decision not to admit the applicant to the procedure for internal competition COM/INT/EU2/10/AD5 for administrators with Bulgarian or Romanian citizenship on account of the fact that the applicant failed the admission tests and of the decision on the complaint authorising the applicant to re-sit the admission tests for the competition in question.
—Annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 31 March 2010 not to admit the applicant to internal competition COM/INT/EU2/10/AD5, so as to enable the applicant to sit the tests;
—annul the decision adopted on 3 August 2010 by the appointing authority in that it did not uphold in its entirety the applicant’s complaint;
—request the Commission, if necessary be means of a measure of inquiry or measure of organisation of procedure, to produce the list of questions asked and answers given at the tests held at 13.00 on 5 March 2010 in Brussels.
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.