- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-714/14: Action brought on 8 October 2014 — Bonney v OHIM — Bruno (ATHEIST)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0714
62014TN0714
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 431/40
(Case T-714/14)
(2014/C 431/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: David Bonney (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vanessa Bruno (Paris, France)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ATHEIST’ — Application for registration No 1 0 0 34 874
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2014 in Case R 803/2013-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the opposition insofar as it concerns goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.