EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-457/14 P: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2015 — Rouffaud v EEAS (Appeal — Civil Service — Auxiliary member of contract staff — Reclassification of contract — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0457

62014TA0457

July 15, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/52

(Case T-457/14 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Auxiliary member of contract staff - Reclassification of contract - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials))

(2015/C 302/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Thierry Rouffaud (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially M. de Abreu Caldas, D. de Abreu Caldas and J. N. Louis, then J. N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 in Rouffaud v EEAS (F-59/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:49), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 in Rouffaud v EEAS (F-59/13, ECR-SC, EU:F:2014:49);

2.Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

3.Reserves the costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia