I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2009/C 129/29
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Valigeria Roncato SpA (Campodarsego, Italy) (represented by: P. Perani, lawyer, and P. Pozzi, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Roncato Srl (Campodarsego, Italy)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 January 2009, notified on 30 January 2009, in joined cases R 237/2008-1 and R 263/2008-1;
—Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs of these proceedings, as well as those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: RONCATO Srl.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark “CARLO RONCATO” (registration application No 4 631 719) for goods in Classes 3, 9 and 14.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian figurative mark “RV RONCATO” (No 622 773), Italian word mark “RONCATO” (No. 510 528) and non-registered Italian figurative marks “RV RONCATO”.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the opposition and upheld the application for registration in its entirety.
Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark.