EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-16/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2008 — Dragoman v Commission (Staff case — Competition — Selection Board — Principle of impartiality of the Selection Board — Article 11a of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment of internal and external candidates — Exclusion of a candidate — Duty to state reasons — Scope — Respect for the secrecy of the deliberations of the selection board)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007FA0016

62007FA0016

January 1, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.6.2008

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/23

(Case F-16/07)

(Staff case - Competition - Selection Board - Principle of impartiality of the Selection Board - Article 11a of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment of internal and external candidates - Exclusion of a candidate - Duty to state reasons - Scope - Respect for the secrecy of the deliberations of the selection board)

(2008/C 158/40)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Applicant: Adriana Dragoman (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: G.-F. Dinulescu, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: K. Herrmann, F. Telea and M. Velardo, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the decisions of the selection board of competition EPSO/AD/34/05 (for the constitution of a reserve list for the recruitment of Romanian-speaking conference interpreters) to award the applicant a mark for the first interpreting test which did not permit her to be admitted to the subsequent tests of that competition — Plea of illegality in respect of Article 6 of Annex III of the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia