I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
2012/C 58/07
Language of the case: Spanish
Appellant: Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, Abogado)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and María Constantina Sotelo Ares
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—declare the appeal admissible;
—set aside in full the judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 in Case T-421/10;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
1.Infringement by the General Court of the duty to state reasons and, in particular, of Article 36 of Protocol (No 3) on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in conjunction with Article 53 thereof.
2.Infringement of the rights of defence of Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega and of the right to a fair hearing and, in particular, of Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
3.Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 (1) of 26 February 2009.
—
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
—