- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-112/23: Order of the General Court of 27 June 2023 — Konings v EUIPO — Manuel Busto Amandi (MAY GOLD) (European Union trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TB0112
62023TB0112
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.8.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 304/23
(Case T-112/23) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 304/27)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Konings NV (Zonhoven, Belgium) (represented by: K. Neefs, S. de Potter and T. Baetens, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P.-F. Karamolegkou and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Manuel Busto Amandi, SA (Villaviciosa, Spain) (represented by: J. Vicente Martínez, lawyer)
Re:
By its action based Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2022 (Case R 1778/2021-4).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Konings NV and Manuel Busto Amandi, SA shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 134, 17.4.2023.