- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-211/15 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 October 2016 — Orange, formerly France Télécom v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — State aid — Aid granted by the French Republic to France Télécom — Reform of the arrangements for financing the retirement pensions of civil servants working for France Télécom — Reduction of the compensation to be paid to the State by France Télécom — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market under certain conditions — Definition of aid — Definition of economic advantage — Selective nature — Adverse effect on competition — Distortion of the facts — No statement of reasons — Substitution of grounds)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CA0211
62015CA0211
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.1.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 6/14
(Case C-211/15 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Appeal - Competition - State aid - Aid granted by the French Republic to France Télécom - Reform of the arrangements for financing the retirement pensions of civil servants working for France Télécom - Reduction of the compensation to be paid to the State by France Télécom - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market under certain conditions - Definition of aid - Definition of economic advantage - Selective nature - Adverse effect on competition - Distortion of the facts - No statement of reasons - Substitution of grounds))
(2017/C 006/17)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Orange, formerly France Télécom (represented by: S. Hautbourg and S. Cochard-Quesson, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and L. Flynn, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Orange to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 245, 27.7.2015.