- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-185/25: Action brought on 17 March 2025 – WM v EIB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0185
62025TN0185
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/2690
19.5.2025
(Case T-185/25)
(C/2025/2690)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WM (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of 9 December 2024 insofar as it decides that the applicant is not fully invalid, within the meaning of Article 46-1 of the EIB Pension Scheme Regulations;
—order the defendant to compensate the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant which can be evaluated, ex aequo et bono, as EUR 20 000;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging the absence of a reasoned report of the Invalidity Committee – Breach of the EIB Pension Scheme Regulations and of the duty to state reasons.
2.Second plea in law, alleging misinterpretation of the notion of invalidity as defined by Article 46-1 of the EIB Pension Scheme Regulations.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2690/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—