- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-331/21: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2022 — mBank v EUIPO — European Merchant Bank (EMBANK European Merchant Bank) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0331
62021TB0331
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/34
(Case T-331/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 284/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: mBank S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and K. Gajek, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: European Merchant Bank UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: G. Pranevičius, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, mBank S.A., seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2021 (Case R 1845/2020-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between itself and the intervener, European Merchant Bank (‘the contested decision’).
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 320, 9.8.2021.