- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-375/16: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Sabre GLBL v EUIPO (INSTASITE) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark INSTASITE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0375
62016TA0375
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.7.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 221/23
(Case T-375/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark INSTASITE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 221/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sabre GLBL, Inc. (Southlake, Texas, United States) (represented by: J. Zecher, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and S. Crabbe, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 (Case R 1742/2015-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign INSTASITE as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Sabre GLBL, Inc. to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017221EN.01002301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017221EN.01002301-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.