- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-47/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2009 — Behmer v Parliament (Promotion — 2005 Promotions procedure — Decision on Policy on promotion and on career planning — Procedure for the award of promotion points in the European Parliament — Unlawfulness of instructions governing that procedure — Consultation of the Staff Regulations Committee — Comparative examination of the merits — Discrimination against staff representatives)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007FA0047
62007FA0047
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/70
(Case F-47/07)
(Promotion - 2005 Promotions procedure - Decision on Policy on promotion and on career planning - Procedure for the award of promotion points in the European Parliament - Unlawfulness of instructions governing that procedure - Consultation of the Staff Regulations Committee - Comparative examination of the merits - Discrimination against staff representatives)
2010/C 24/126
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Joachim Behmer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: C. Burgos and R. Ignătescu, Agents)
Re:
First, annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of the Parliament not to appoint the applicant to grade A*13 in the 2005 promotions procedure and, second, declaration of the unlawfulness of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament relating to the ‘Policy on promotion and on career planning’ of 6 July 2005 and of the ‘Implementing measures relating to the award of merit points and to promotion’ of 25 July 2005.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 170, 21.7.2007, p. 43.